![]() |
| Did you know what it meant? |
Researched and Written by Walt Chiquoine --
In my prior post, I introduced you to William Guest, an affluent and educated guy who settled in MCH in 1682. We know he was an attorney, judge, and representative, and he finally settled on a large tract that includes today’s Stanton. After years of litigation, he gained full control of the first mill seat at Stanton from Cornelius Empson. The mill property was sold by Guest’s estate in 1720. So for a number of years, William Guest lived in Stanton and managed the mills and tenants on his property. He must have been a very public figure to his peers at court and to his humble neighbors.
William Guest may have left another legacy for early
Stanton. We know there are 18th
century references to the area as Cuckoldstown, and I’ve agreed with Scott
Palmer and others that this could have originated as Cocclestown for the shellfish that were plentiful in the creeks and estuaries. Other historians suggested the name may have
come from an Inn that hosted adulterous trysts, but that of itself seems an
inappropriate use of the term cuckold. And
it just doesn’t seem that noteworthy since it was probably true of many taverns,
and I struggled with that explanation.
A cuckold is a husband that suffers or tolerates (or even
encourages) his wife’s promiscuity in a way that is publicly known. Then and now, I imagine it happens pretty
regularly, but to name a village for it?
It’s a derisive and condescending label.
I assume it would require the cuckold and the cuckolding to be a
well-known person that involved well-known events, something that really stood
out in people’s minds like a bad joke, something to gossip about. Could the cuckold be William Guest, in the
sense that it was his Cuckold’s Town? Not the plural, but the possessive…



