Tweed's Tavern today |
While many 18th and 19th Century taverns were no more than family homes lightly outfitted to host guests, the establishment that would come to be known as Tweed's Tavern seems to have been built specifically as a tavern. But as well-documented as its later history is, the earliest years of the tavern have some frustrating holes. The history of the land goes back much further, of course, but for our purposes here we'll start in the 1790's. It's here that I have a quiet disagreement with some of the published histories. I've seen it written that in 1790, Brandywine Hundred native Stephen Foulk purchased 96 acres of land along the Limestone Road from John Gregg. Stephen was the younger brother of William Foulk, owner of the former Evans mill on Red Clay Creek that would later become the Fell Spice Mill.
The people are correct, but unfortunately the 1790 deed that's referenced (in a 1997 DelDOT report) is not available for me to see. What I have found is a December 1796 indenture tripartite between John Gregg, Stephen Foulk, and John Crow. Admittedly it's a little confusing to me, but it sure seems like Gregg is selling the 96 acres for the first time. I believe he's selling it to Foulk, but with a one year lease agreement between Foulk and Crow. [Thanks to our friend Walt C., I think we have an answer now. For the full explanation, check out his comment from 2/10/2023 down below. The short version is that this 1796 transaction was a sort of legal end-around to make sure the 1790 sale from Gregg to Foulk was legit and binding. I still feel it's not a coincidence that Crow was involved in this maneuver.] The significance of this is that John Crow was a well-known innkeeper in New Castle and Wilmington, and is identified in the deed as an innkeeper. The prevailing thought is that it was Crow who built, on the northern end of the 96 acre tract, a two-story log house for use as a tavern.
The list of rates for inns and taverns in New Castle County, as issued by the NCC Justices of the Peace in 1797. John Crow or Isaac Wilcox would have posted this in their tavern |
There doesn't seem to be any evidence that Crow actually ran the tavern, but there is tavern license application in the 1790’s from Isaac Wilcox. Figuring out exactly who ran a particular tavern when can be tricky for a couple reasons. First, much like with mills, sometimes the property owner operated it and sometimes an outside "professional" was brought it. And while with taverns there's the extra step of licensing, that procedure and the records of it are often spotty. So perhaps Stephen Foulk ran the tavern himself for a while, but if he did, he didn't for long -- that's because in April 1799, he died.
His widow Hannah and brother William were left as the administrators of his estate, and over the next few years they sold off the nearly 100 acres in several pieces. Joseph Phillips, a blacksmith who already owned land to the west of the property, bought 31 of the acres fronting Limestone Road. He quickly sold 2½ acres on the road just above the tavern to another blacksmith, Ezekiel Reece. This lot would make its way back into the history books in another century and a half, but we'll return to that later. The largest portion, the southern 64 acres which included the mansion house, was sold to Samuel Lindsey.
But most importantly to our story, in early 1801 Hannah and William Foulk sold about 10¾ acres, including the tavern, to a cooper from Montgomery County, PA named James Harvey. Harvey did apply for a tavern license, and from his application we learn that it had recently been operated by the blacksmith next door, Ezekiel Reece. Harvey didn't stick around long, though, because in September 1802 he sold the property to a house carpenter from Lancaster County -- John Tweed.
The tavern license was briefly held by Samuel Johnston in 1803, but in May 1804 Tweed applied for himself. Interestingly, a road plat of the area drawn in 1804 labels the establishment as "New Tavern called Mudfort Tavern". To the best of my knowledge it's not known where that name came from or even if it was used for long. Another plat from four years later labels it as John Tweed's Tavern, and it would remain so for about the next 20 years.
Tweed expanded his holdings in 1804 by purchasing 23½ acres from Joseph Phillips, part of the land which he had acquired from the Foulk estate. The innkeeper did this by taking out a mortgage on his property, and it seems he remained in debt the rest of his life. Judging by what records remain, Tweed's Tavern was on the smaller end of the spectrum as far as tavern size, and was never as prominent as the next inn down the road, the Mermaid Tavern. This could explain his financial problems, or maybe his situation explains why the tavern was never bigger.
Portion of the 1820 Heald map, with Tweed's Tavern circled |
In 1814 Tweed purchased the 2½ acre Reece lot next door, and five years earlier had bought 15½ acres north of Hockessin, along the new Newport and Gap Turnpike. This purchase was likely speculative, and ties into the first of the two forces that ultimately killed Tweed's tavern. The turnpike movement was in full steam in the late 1700's and early 1800's, but Limestone Road was not a part of it. The Newport and Gap Turnpike, and its Lancaster Turnpike branch, took much traffic from Limestone Road and consequently from the taverns along it.
By 1823 Tweed's financial situation had become so dire that a sheriff's sale was imminent. He apparently died during the proceeding, and his property and tavern were sold to Joseph Roman, the New Garden, PA resident whose blacksmith and/or wheelwright shops were just north of the tavern on Limestone Road. Roman finally paid off all of Tweed's mortgages, and in January 1825 sold the tavern and most of the land back to John Tweed's widow, Elizabeth, and his sons Curtis and James. Curtis had actually applied for a tavern license in 1824, and presumably ran the inn for the next few years.
Elizabeth Tweed sold her share of the property in 1830 to her sons, who also had acquired another adjacent 33 acres. The Tweed brothers, like their father, were saddled with debts they couldn't pay, so in 1831 they were forced to sell it all (now totaling 67 acres) to Ross Dixon. After this point there are no identifiable tavern licenses associated with the property, and it's very possible that the site's use as a tavern ended along with the Tweed family's connection to it. Plus, at this time the other force negatively impacting taverns was just ramping up -- the railroads.
1930 view looking north along Limestone Road |
Aerial view of Tweed's Tavern from the early 1950's, looking south. Valley Rd is visible, as is the addition on the north end |
The house stayed in the Giacomelli family until 1989, when it was sold and converted into office space. The final (or at least, current) phase in the tavern's history was initiated by the very thing that made it possible in the first place -- Limestone Road. In the late 1990's, DelDOT drew up plans to widen Limestone Road and to reconfigure the Valley Road intersection. To that end, the state purchased the home with plans to demolish it. However, when archeologists started investigating the house they rediscovered the long-hidden log structure within, and the movement began to save the old log tavern.
The Giacomelli House in 1990, with front porch and addition on the right |
The Giacomelli House (with Tweed's Tavern inside) after the temporary move in June 2000 |
Wow, utterly fascinating, what a good read! I like the desegregation tangent as well. The pictures are priceless and put the story in context. Thank you for your research and great writing!
ReplyDeleteThank you for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
DeleteFantastic job, Scott. Exceptional read. For many years, a local brewery named one of their flagship beers after Tweed's Tavern, referring to it as the state's first brewery. I've not discovered evidence that any brewing occurred at Tweed's, though it certainly did at other 18th century taverns and saloons.
ReplyDeleteWell, you of all people should know that there was brewing in the state before 1795, so I think we can dismiss that part. But like you say, it wasn't uncommon for it to happen, and the first likely operator (Crow) was a pro, so onsite brewing there might fall into the category of, "Well, maybe". Possible it could have been the first brewery in the Hockessin area.
Deleteawesome👍
ReplyDeleteThanks, Andy!
DeleteScott, I was trying to catch up on your prolific research, and I came across this post. I can try to address the Gregg/Foulk/Crow agreement if I may, altho' I didn't read them in detail recently. Back in the day, English feudal law required what was called a "fee tail". Basically, a property owner could only pass his land to a surviving son; if he had no legit survivor, the property passed back to a prior grantor, and that could be a Lord or Proprietor. The owner was not free to sell it outright.
ReplyDeleteIn order to sell the land outright, there was a formal process called "breaking the fee tail". The original owner would sign a deed of sale to one party (not valid), and a one-year lease to a second party. Once the land was leased, the party holding the invalid deed could go to court, sue the lessee (who is now the possessor), and win ownership of the land. The last step was known as "common recovery". It was a "tripartite" agreement, nobody got hurt, and it happened a lot. Confused the heck out of me for a couple years.
This might be helpful to others when looking at 18th century deeds. In this case, Foulk was the buyer, and Crow was the lessee - I bet if you look, his lease fee was one peppercorn. They all may have had other business relationships as well, as you point out. And I think the state or county abandoned the fee tail before 1800, it disappeared and everything now is "fee simple".
Thanks Walt!!! I would never have figured that out on my own. I've added a note in the post referencing your comment. I've obviously seen the term "in fee simple" many times, but now I know what it means. Thanks!!!
Delete