If you appreciate the work done on this blog, please consider making a small donation. Thank you!

If you appreciate the work done on this blog, please consider making a small donation. Thank you!

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

The Armstrongs of Woodland and Brookland

Brookland
In the last post, we began looking at the Armstrong family of southwestern Christiana Hundred, a portion of which they came to dominate in the 19th Century. We saw four generations of Robert Armstrongs, at least three of whom lived on the farm called Hedgeland, located at the present-day site of DuPont's Chestnut Run facility. The funny thing is, this is not even what I started out researching. Initially I was looking into two other Armstrong properties -- Woodland and Brookland -- situated west of Centre Road (Route 141) and south of Faulkland Road. The recent removal of the Woodland name (which I doubt many people knew dated back at least 200 years) from a prominent place along the road got me thinking about the area, which in turn lead me down the whole Armstrong family path.

In the Armstrongs of Hedgeland post I noted that most of the family biographical information (which primarily came from Runks) began with Robert Armstrong (1743-1821). It said little other than A) he served in the Revolutionary War, B) owned a farm called "The Hedge", and C) had two sons, Robert and William. In the first post we followed the line of son Robert. In this one we'll take a look at William and his descendants.

William Armstrong (1777-1840) was likely born on his father's Hedge farm, as best as I can tell, in 1777. As noted in the last post many of the dates for the Armstrongs tend to vary from place to place. In the Runks biography of one of his grandsons, it states that William fought in the Continental Army during the Revolution. If this date of birth is anywhere close to correct, I think we can safely rule that out and say that he actually fought in the War of 1812, like his brother Robert. It would have been in this conflict then, that William rose to the rank of Major, a rank he proudly wore the rest of his life (and beyond -- his headstone id's him as Major William Armstrong).

If William grew up at Hedgeland as seems reasonable, he soon moved away to his own farm, but not very far away. By at least 1806, William was residing at the farm he called Woodland, a name still very much in use, although I doubt many know the name dates back over 200 years. Woodland occupied the southwest corner of 141 and Faulkland Road, with the manor house probably sitting near the back of the apartment/condo complex, until recently, known as Woodland Terrace. (Its name change to "Greenville at 141" is what got me thinking about the area in the first place.) Having not seen any property records relating to the tract, it's unclear whether Woodland was a part of the larger family holdings, or whether William purchased it himself. Major William Armstrong lived on his Woodland farm until his death in 1840, after which he was buried at St. James Church near Stanton, like so many in his family.

The Armstrong area in 1868

Maj. Armstrong and his wife Ann had eight children, the first five of whom were sons. Of these boys, Robert (the oldest) moved away to farm first in White Clay Creek Hundred, and then in Pencader Hundred. The youngest, George, moved to Wilmington. Second son John Paulson (1808-1885) purchased his own farm, Oakland, located west of Centerville Road near today's Little Falls Corporate Center. The other two sons stayed even closer to home. After Maj. Armstrong's 1840 passing, ownership of Woodland went to the fourth son, James Armstrong (1818-1873). James lived the rest of his life at Woodland, after which it remained in the family.

The remaining son, William Armstrong (1815-1890), third child of Maj. Armstrong, would eventually cultivate the last of the Armstrong estates in the area. William was born at Woodland in 1815, although this is an example of the dates not agreeing in different sources. Runks says he was born in 1806, the 1850 Census implies 1820, but his headstone says 1815. For our purposes, I'm going with the date literally written in stone. Whatever the true date was, William grew up at Woodland, then as a young man trained to be a blacksmith. He moved to Wilmington where he worked in that profession, before eventually returning to Christiana Hundred about 1850.

Like some of the personal dates surrounding the family, that 1850 date for William's purchase of Brookland seems to be an approximation. Since the Runks tome that it came from was written nearly a half century later, I'm willing to cut them some slack on this one. However, the 1849 map clearly shows William already owning the property. On the 1850 Census he's listed as owning property, but is shown in the same household with his brother James at Woodland. Perhaps he was in the midst of building or rebuilding the house at Brookland at the time of the census. Again, like with his father's purchase of Woodland, it's not clear whether William bought part of a larger family tract or if he purchased a neighboring farm from someone else. What I do know, though, is that his house is still there, tucked away in the middle of the Brookland Terrace development.

While residing at his Brookland farm, William and his wife Mary Lowber (Banning) had three children. The youngest, and the only son to reach manhood, was William J. Armstrong (1861-1925). [Again, Runks says 1862 but his headstone says 1861.] After finishing his schooling (both locally and in Wilmington), William J. returned to Brookland and worked his father's farm. After William, Sr.'s death in 1890 (or 1892 if you go by Runks), William J. took over ownership of the property and home. He also owned neighboring Woodland. His Uncle James had died in 1873, but the 1881 map shows it as owned by his wife Mary. So sometime between 1881 and 1899, Mary sold the farm to either her brother-in-law or nephew.

William J. Armstrong presumably lived on his Brookland farm until his death in 1925. Since the earliest homes in the Brookland Terrace/Centre Road area began to go up only a few years later, it seems likely that the land was sold to developers after his passing. The farms may have passed into history during the interwar period, but the names live on. So the next time you drive along 141 and see a street sign for Brookland Aveneue or Woodland Heights, bear in mind that those names go back over 150 and 200 years, respectively. Just another neat example of how sometimes our history is still there in plain sight, if you know where to look.

16 comments:

  1. i can look out my bedroom window and see the armstrong place. my house was built in 1920 i believe. my mom and dad's house down the street in 1930 or so. the terrace is a great old neighborhood. all the houses are different. people bought lots (each lot was like 30 x 100) and you bought as many as you wanted and built your own house on it. my lot is 60x100. so it is actually 2 lots.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good old days when you could get a nice piece of property to build a house on!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have a metal plate photo of what my grandmother, Edna Springer Lamborn, told us was of the house that stood where the entrance of Chestnut Run duPont buildings are today. She said it stood on route 141 facing the road. Nine people are sitting on the porch. On the back of the plate is an advertisement for the Pennellograph Copying Co'y, S. J. Collingson, Agent, Kirkwood, Delaware. My grandmother was a decendent of Robert Louis Armstrong. She told us it was a beautiful, well kept farm and she was always sad to have seen it developed. I will try to take a photo of it and send it to you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would be awesome! I've never seen a good picture of it, only the blurry aerial photos. If you can, you can send it to mchhistory@verizon.net. I also can't help but notice the Springer and Lamborn names, too. Sounds like you may have long roots in the area, in addition to the Armstrong's.

      Delete
    2. My dad was born in 1921. Went to St Joseph’s on the Brandywine. His dad rented a home on the Brandywine at the bottom of Brecks Lane from Mrs du Pont Copland. As child he would walk to the du Pont Estate at the now Chestnut Run facility. Henry
      du Pont jr had an airstrip there. He would give my dad rides on his plane. Also Charles Lindbergh landed there in 1927. You can YouTube the visit.

      Delete
    3. Sounds like you have a lot of connection to the area. I can vaguely remember the airport -- it was on the way to my grandparents' house -- but I certainly had no idea what it really was. Before long people will be saying, "I remember back when this was all office buildings!"

      Delete
  4. I grew up in Brookland Terrace. As a child in the 1960’s,
    The Armstrong House was a mysterious presence. I saw Mr Armstrong once, sitting on his front porch in a rocking chair. The house sat back maybe 200 feet from the road.
    Later in the early 70s the house was bought by local business owners. My sister babysat for them so I got to see the inside. She said at night she noises. Thought it was haunted. Once a few friends and I went into the barn. It was a scary thing to do. Inside we saw an old horse carriage, dusty and cobwebbed. As an adult, permeated with nostalgia, I would love to live in that beautiful house.. ghost or no ghost. My friends owned a mid 19th century house on Faulkland, rd and said they heard voices of children. At night. Asked where their own children were who were easy for the weekend. How about that! Makes you wonder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very cool and creepy stories! Homes like that definitely have a lot of history and stories, maybe some we don't understand. I just think it's a great example of hidden history, at least from me. I've been going through that area my whole life and never until doing this post realized there was an old house in there or that those names went back that far.

      (And don't worry about the posts, I have trouble with them, too. It's the site. I tried to post a reply last week and couldn't even get it to work.)

      Delete
  5. Sorry for the repost. I am not savvy with this stuff

    ReplyDelete
  6. First of all, great job Scott! The history of the area is of great interest to me as well, much appreciated! I lived in Brookland Terrace from 1979-1991. My parents bought the house at 410 hillside ave. and my Mother grew up in Brookland Terrace living at 710 Hillside ave. 710 & 712 Hillside ave. are the combined addresses of a barn that was converted into my grandparents(Glynn) residence. My great-grandparents(Truitt) home was actually at 714 Hillside ave. but was lost to the state when Faukland road was upgraded. I’ve estimated that my grandparents moved into the house at 710 around 1933 but it’s merely a guess. Until recently I’ve never thought about the origin of this barn but after finding your website, logic has it that it would've belonged to the Armstrong family. Would love to find more info about that but I have no idea where to start. Scott, I thoroughly enjoy sifting through the history that you’ve provided and look forward to future posts. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to shoot me an email at superjah29@yahoo.com…John

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment, John. So, at 410 you were closer to the old house that's still there. But you're right, the whole area was Armstrong land so 710-712 would have been theirs, too. Still owned by your family? Looking at the historic aerials, looks like 714 went down between 1965 and 68. You can see even on the 1868 map in this post that there was another W. Armstrong house on the SE corner of Centerville Rd and Faulkland Rd. Since eventually William J owned everything, I wonder if he had 710-712 built? It's cinderblock, so that makes me think early 20th Century. It's big, but doesn't strike me as full-fledged barn big. So maybe some sort of auxiliary farm building, like for equipment storage or maintenance? In any case, a very interesting building.

      Delete
    2. Then again, I'm not a farmer so I don't know what the technical difference is between a "barn" and whatever I was trying to describe.

      Delete
    3. Hey Scott, from what I gather from looking at the old maps online. I’m pretty sure that on the map you provide, a square black block with dashes from it to a road designated a house structure and a square black block without dashes/lines leading to a road usually meant a structure other than the residence. I very well could be wrong but using that theory and applying it to the map of 1868, the brookland and woodland farmhouses would be the two squares with dashes. The Square w/o dashes on the woodland farm(near faukland rd) is a barn type structure that is still there today. As you stated, The square w/o dashes on the brookland farm is located closer to the intersection of faukland rd & centerville rd., where as my grandmothers house is obviously a few streets over. There in lies my confusion. Is the barn possibly just noted incorrectly on the map or ?? Yes, It wasn’t a huge barn but what an amazing structure. Some parts of the barn are still visible in the attic and cellar. When I was a kid(1970’s) the garage on the 712 side was still horse stables with an old car in there…ah the good old days! As you could probably tell, I could talk about this topic for days, but I’ll leave off with an interesting piece of info that I've been told by my Mother Susan(2nd youngest of 9 children)Apparently dances used to be held at the barn prior to my grandparents purchasing the property and the story goes that an Aunt on my Fathers side would go to the dances after spending time at Brandywine Springs Amusement Park…John

      Delete
    4. First of all (although you didn't say this), I want to be clear that I'm in no way trying to downplay or minimize the barn. In fact, I've driven by on Faulkland many times and seen it down there and wondered what it was, so I'm thrilled to learn more about it. I love the story about the dances, because I've heard similar tales about barn dances elsewhere. And yes, I absolutely believe they would have been very familiar with Brandywine Springs. Practically in their backyard.

      On the old maps, pretty much all the dots are houses (or mills, schools, churches, etc.). The dotted lines are private roads or driveways. Sometimes a dotted line on one map will be a "real" road on a later map. Almost all these houses would have had outbuildings around them, including barns which were usually pretty close to the house. They are not shown on the maps. What I find confusing is that there were often multiple houses on a given farm -- main farmhouse, maybe a tenant farmer house or two, then sometimes other better houses built for family members' families (married or single sons, or married daughters). Sometimes these houses are shown, sometimes they're not.

      Last thing about the barn in particular. Again, unless I'm mistaken (always an option), it looks like it's made from cinder block (at least the lower part). Cinder block wasn't used until the early 1900s, so that's why I say it was a relatively later addition to the farm. Still could easily be well over 100 years old.

      Delete
    5. You’re absolutely right. The entire barn is constructed of 12 inch concrete block as well as a wall that lines the driveway and curves toward Faukland rd. The driveway used to feed out to Faukland road until the road was raised and widened. Apparently the interior carpentry was finished by my grandfathers co-workers, funny thing is, my grandfather was a painter for Duponts. They did a great job, I’m pretty sure most of the original structural wood is still in place.
      My interest mostly lies in who built it and why? Did the period barn burn down and this was the replacement? Recently I learned that my great-grandfather Truitt(714 hillside) kept horses in the barn prior to my grandparents(Glynn) purchasing the property…so the plot thickens?! Do you have any info regarding the aerial photos you mentioned previously, website etc…I eventually plan on contacting the ncc recorder of deeds but in the meantime I appreciate any info from you or your readers regarding this topic or related topics.
      Scott, again I want to thank you for providing such an interesting and informative platform for people to share history/ memories, especially ones that we can all relate to…Even if its due to the mere fact that we all share a familiar feeling about the area.

      Delete
    6. Hey Scott, just wanted to clarify why I was asking for website info on the aerial photos. I’ve tried using several of your links(archiplanet, aerial maps, Chris’ etc…) as well as accessing the websites attached to the links but they either won’t load or say page cannot be found/ does not exist?? Again, any info would be helpful. JohnD…

      Delete