1839 MCH Tax Book |
Frankly, I wouldn't be able to do any of this if I had to actually go out and hunt down each document I needed individually. I don't have the time, gas money, or energy for that. This blog could not have existed before the internet, and not just because where would I have put it? Having said that (and having used up about a minute of your life doing so), once in a while I'm lucky enough to actually get my hands on original, true, honest to goodness historical documents. Thanks to the generosity of some wonderful people and the foresight of their ancestors, this is one of those times.
This is also a story of serendipity, great timing, and a fortunate coincidence. After having been contacted by Dick Joyce, and while in the midst of researching the Graves Road area (of which the Peoples Farm post became the first), I got another email that would help to focus my investigating. This one came from Bob Pigford, on behalf of himself and his wife, Patsy. Patsy's mother, Helen Pierson Houchin, had passed away early last year at the age of 96. In going through her belongings, they came across several items they thought I might be interested in. I was, very much, and you'll find out more about two of them in a moment. But first, I'll explain why their contacting me was so fortuitous and coincidental, and it works on at least three different levels, all having to do with Patsy's family.
First, Patsy's grandfather (Helen's father) was Kemper Bryant Pierson. I had come across the name before, as he was a builder in the Marshallton area. The Piersons lived on the outskirts of Marshallton, where they were intertwined with the Balls and Klairs featured in the Edward Cranston House story. His wife was the former Sarah Edith Klair, daughter of Aaron Francis Klair. Aaron Klair (Patsy's great-grandfather) was the author of an infamous anti-liquor law, and I had just finished refreshing myself on him for my talk last fall at the Greenbank Mill. And finally, the Pierson family in the 19th Century had lived...along Graves Road next to the Peoples family. Patsy's family were neighbors of the Joyces in the 50's and 60's!
But on top of all that, Bob and Patsy had some items to show me. Two of them are the amazing records feature here. Passed down through the Pierson family were two tax assessment books dating from 1839 and 1840. The books were originally the property of William Cloud Pierson (1793-1875), Patsy's Great-great-great grandfather. William C. Pierson was a Hockessin farmer, whose property lay on the west side of Lancaster Pike just below the Pennsylvania line. For at least the years of 1839 and 1840, he also served as the tax collector for Mill Creek Hundred. And luckily for us, he held on to the books after he was done collecting the taxes.
Duplicate Assessment List Mill Creek Hundred 1840 |
It appears that William probably passed the books down to his son John B. Pierson (1833-1922), who in turn gave it to his son, also named William Cloud Pierson (1861-1939). An inscription near the back of the 1839 book states, "This book given to Kemper B. Pierson by William C. Pierson. Nov. 5, 1923". This younger William C. was the cousin of Kemper's father. From there it passed down a couple generations to Patsy and Bob through her mother. Now, having given you the background and provenance of the book, what exactly is in them and what can they tell us?
The beginning of the F's for 1839 |
The bulk of each of the books is comprised of a list of MCH residents (I think it's all heads of household, although it could be land owners), the assessed value of their property, and the tax they owed. There were three different taxes levied by New Castle County -- a Road tax, a County Tax, and a Poor Tax. In the instructions written out for the collector, it's stated that the taxes are to be collected at the rate of forty cents per hundred dollars for the Road and County tax, and seven cents for the Poor tax. It must have been changed at some point, because the amounts listed in the book work out to be about 0.57%, if my math is correct. (Ok, if my computer's calculator's math is correct.) The total amount listed in the 1839 book is $4596.27 for the County (and Road) tax and $804.35 for the Poor tax, for a total tax burden for the hundred of $5400.62. Working backwards gives a total assessed value for MCH of a little over $947,000.
First page of instructions for 1839 |
For the year 1840, the tax rates were listed as thirty cents per hundred for the County and Road, and six cents for the Poor tax. The actual rate ends up being right about 0.5%. Again, I can't explain the discrepancy. The 1840 totals were $3754.27 and $750.86, totaling $4505.13. So that year the hundred was worth just over $901,000. I can't seem to find it now, but I think in one of the books it stated there were seven hundred and some entries. I should have a better total soon (and more about that in a moment).
So the books give us a wonderful (and presumably complete) list of households in MCH, but unlike the census these are listed alphabetically. I'm not sure I understand the process correctly (maybe someone else could help), but this is how I think it went. Pierson was given the book with the names, assessed values, and tax amounts already filled in. I think it's unlikely that he went around the hundred door to door collecting taxes, although there might have been a little of that. I know that later on I've seen notices in the newspaper giving notice of dates and places (usually taverns or stores) where residents could go and pay their taxes. I assume that something like this was happening in 1839/1840, too. Interestingly, the books have notes for people who have left the state, and presumably were unavailable to be collected from. And since I guess farmer was the assumed, default occupation, those who weren't have a notation of theirs next to their name (like cooper, weaver, t[avern] keeper, etc.). The occasional "(N)", I'm assuming, stood for "Negro". It's also stated that the Collector has the authority to take to jail (gaol, actually) anyone who refuses to pay.
"Receipts" for Pierson's payments of his collections |
Toward the back of the books are what are essentially written receipts of payments of the tax money made by Pierson to various officials. There are about a dozen or so, made from about the middle of the tax year to the middle of the following year. This further bolsters the idea that the taxes were collected by Pierson in parts over the course of a year. Although I have included some photos of the book here, posting every page of each book would be pretty bulky. Instead, what I plan to do (and have already started) is to transcribe the names, values, and tax amounts into a spreadsheet, and make them available to all. With any luck I may have 1839 done next week, with 1840 to follow. I just have to remember how to use Google Drive.
I want to again thank Bob and Patsy Pigford for finding these amazing artifacts and sharing them with us. I can't imagine that there are too many items like these floating around out there, and they can provide some very useful information. If anyone has any other specific questions about the books or their contents, I'd be happy to answer whatever I can. In the meantime, enjoy these two 180 year old treasures.
Edit 3/1/2019:
I do have the finished product available for the 1839 and
1840 tax books, and I have just a few more things to say about them. There’s
still a lot I don’t know about them, but Walt Chiquoine was able to give me a
few more tidbits. It seems at that time there was a full assessment done every
ten years on the twos (1802, 1812, 1822, etc.). In between they pretty much
just carried everything over, only making changes for sales, arrivals and
departures from the area (and life), and so forth. There were two sets of
books, one for the collector and one for the county.
I’ve done the best I can in transcribing them, but there
were times when I had to just make my best guess. If at any point anyone has
questions about a particular entry, I will do my best to clarify it. And since
everybody likes rich people (right?), I’ll tell you there were 13 men whose assessed
property value was very near or over $10,000. I think I know who they all were,
and several have already been written about on the blog. The winner (by quite a
bit) at $24,927 was not even a MCH resident – Thomas Cooch. For just a few
years around that time, he owned the Roseville mill site east of Newark. I
think that’s what was valued. The highest “real” MCH resident was Simon
Cranston at $16,813, followed closely by Samuel Meeteer (of the later Curtis
paper mill). The others were Matthew Newkirk’s estate (Brandywine Springs hotel
owner), Thomas Little, Samuel Bailey, Abel Jeans, George Janvier, David
Eastburn’s estate, Joseph Mitchell, Thomas Jackson, Abraham Brown’s estate, and
Andrew Gray.
The transcriptions can be found here. A link will also be permanently located on the sidebar of the blog. If anyone has any other
questions, feel free to ask.
Scott, I saw some comments on this on the facebook post regarding the right of someone other than the State to own one of these books. In 2006 I attended the auction of the possessions of Nancy Churchman Sawin when she moved to a nursing home. The online advertisement showed one of these Tax Books from about 1840. The page to which it was opened on the online preview had Eastburns on it, so naturally I went to the auction to bid on the book. When I arrived I was looking all over for it and couldn't find it. I asked and was told it had been confiscated by the State of DE the day before. Now that word is out of the existence of this book, you had better move quickly on the transcription work! I did end up with a nice little gem that day. It is a copy of Cooch's " A Little Known History Of Newark, Delaware And It's Environs". It is signed by the author to William Penn Frank, a well known DE book collector and has his book plate in the front.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the heads-up. Someone else also mentioned that same auction. I guess I'll just work as fast as I can. It honestly never would have occured to me that the state would be so territorial about 180 year old items. If they want it I won't fight, of course, but I'm not trying to make any money off of them. I'm just trying to make the information available. I've seen where other tax assessment lists have been transcribed and posted, so I hope at least that if they do come, they'd just want the physical book and wouldn't say that the data is confidential or proprietary. Either way, it'll make the most boring episode of Cops ever.
DeleteScott, just got your face book message and downloaded the spreadsheets. This is a real gem and I commented as such on Facebook. Thanks again not only for sharing, but for working, educating and including all of us who treasure the past and what still remains in the present of our unique area. The facts, interpretations and your awesome sense of humor have really made this quite an enjoyable hobby for many of us. Once again, great job and many thanks. Dave O.
ReplyDeleteThanks again, Dave. It's nice to know the work is appreciated.
DeleteScott, Great job on translating the tax books. I see my 4 and 5x great grandfathers listed in it. So many names of relations as well. What a wonderful service you do for us history buffs with your Mill Creek History Blog and Facebook page. Please keep up the good work. You will be remembered in history for your efforts. Frances Clancy-Green
ReplyDeleteThanks, Frances. I'm glad there are people like you who enjoy and see the value in things like this.
DeleteThanks for researching and sharing this. I stumbled upon this while searching for more information about William C. Pierson. Your article and old maps show the general location of his home off of Lancaster Pike before crossing into PA. I've been curious about the specific location of his home and more details about the type of home, or a description, of his home. I grew up in Wellington Hills, land that was once part of the Pierson estate I believe. Our house abutted the fields and forests close to the VFW building. As I kid, I played in and explored that area. Down by the creek, below the VFW building, was the remnants of an old spring house. And about 50 yards away closer to Lancaster Pike, in a ravine, were the remains (large stones) of some kind of building of the same age. I've been curious if this was actually the W C Pierson house. If you or anyone knows more about the W C Pierson home, please share!
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing. I hadn't looked specifically or closely at this before, but after looking quickly now here's my best guess. From what I can see, I think the WC Pierson farm was what's now Deerfield. The maps show 30 acres for him and when I measure it on the NCC Parcel site (a great tool, btw) Deerfield is almost exactly 30 acres. That includes the VFW property on its SE edge. I think the house itself was where the two houses are, just before Lora Lane. Looks like there's a geodesic dome house there. Wellington Hills itself is on the neighboring farm, but that wooded area was Pierson's.
DeleteThanks for looking into it Scott. That geodesic dome building was there before the house built right next to it. In fact it was there the last time to wandered around in the ruins of what might have been the WC Pierson farm less than 50 yards away toward Wellington Hills. I guess we'll never know for sure. I do see on a an old map a D Herring house due south from WC Pierson farm. What do we know about D Herring?
DeleteFunny story about him. He doesn't show up until after the 1860 map. On 1868 it's D Herring. On 1881 and 1893 it's D. O'Heron. Both are wrong. It's David Ahern. He was born in Ireland in 1799, came to the US maybe in the 1830's or 50's. In 1860 he was living in New Garden Township with wife Catherine and son Jeremiah (his age is off by 20 years on that census). In 1862 he bought 7.36 acres from John Cloud. I think it was on the southern edge of the Pierson farm, probably part of Wellington Hills now. If your old house was south of the VFW, you might have been on it. He sold his land in 1889 to Dennis Dinneen. Ahern died Feb 22, 1893, and is buried at St. Mary's Cemetery in West Grove with Catherine, who died in 1899.
DeleteI thought I would stump you with that one Scott! You are a great resource and scholar of all things MCH. Very interesting sleuthing about about David Ahern. Curious they got his name so wrong. The house I grew up in was the first house you hit in Wellington Hills when you go East of the VFW. The VFW parking lot was right behind our back yard. If you go down the hill due West of the VFW building to the creek, there were ruins right there of an old spring house and possibly other buildings too. I'm thinking this may have been where his house was. Who knows. In the 70's my sister and I were exploring down there and she found a tin snuff box with a cameo on it. I also found an old wagon wheel.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the kind words. Regarding his name, this might sound dumb but I've always wondered how many times names were written wrong (on maps and censuses) because of accents. I'm not sure how the info was gathered for maps, but I assume the same way as for the census, which was going out and talking to people. If you're talking to someone with an accent (like the Irish Ahern), you might hear it wrong. Say "Ahern" with a thick brogue and you can see where Herring or O'Heron might have come from. Also FWIW, I've notice before the 1893 map being wrong. It seems to largely have copied the 1881. Ahern sold in 1889 and shouldn't even be on it, but I've seen that happen before where the 1893 wasn't up to date.
DeleteThese maps are obviously not GPS-level accurate as far as house placement, and it gets even trickier when the house is away from the road, but I think it's definitely possible that those ruins and artifacts could have been Aherns.
Your theory about inaccurate names on these old maps seems quite plausible, actually probable I think. Being 100% accurate likely wasn't so important in those days not to mention very difficult and time-consuming ie get on a horse or go for a really long walk.
ReplyDelete